Russia’s ban from all major sport events cut to two years
0 Comments
Russia’s men’s football team will be able to play at next year’s delayed Euro 2020 finals

Russia’s ban from all major sporting events after a doping scandal has been cut to two years by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

The ban still prevents Russia from competing in the Tokyo Olympics and Paralympics, set to be held next year, and football’s 2022 World Cup in Qatar.

Russia was initially given a four-year ban by the World Anti-Doping Agency.

Cas said the reduction of the ban should not be seen “as any validation” of Russia’s conduct.

The ban will now run until 16 December 2022, meaning Russia is also banned from competing at the Winter Olympics in Beijing in February.

Russia will be allowed to play at next year’s delayed Euro 2020 tournament because European football’s governing body Uefa is not defined as a “major event organisation” with regards to rulings on anti-doping breaches.

Wada declared Russia’s Anti Doping Agency (Rusada) non-compliant for manipulating laboratory data handed over to investigators in January 2019.

Russia had been told to hand over data to Wada as a condition of its controversial reinstatement in 2018 after a three-year suspension for its vast state-sponsored doping scandal.

“The panel has imposed consequences to reflect the nature and seriousness of the non-compliance and to ensure that the integrity of sport against the scourge of doping is maintained,” said Cas, which announced the ruling on Thursday.

“It has considered matters of proportionality and, in particular, the need to effect cultural change and encourage the next generation of Russian athletes to participate in clean international sport.”

Russia has also been prevented from hosting international events during the same period.

When Wada announced its sanction last December, Russian prime minister Dmitry Medvedev said the ban was part of “chronic anti-Russian hysteria”.

Will there be no sign of Russia at these events?

Russian athletes who can prove they are untainted by the doping scandal will be able to compete under a neutral flag.

They can wear a kit which contains Russian colours, but it cannot bear the Russian flag or any national symbol.

If their kit displays the name ‘Russia’ – written in any language – it cannot be more prominent than the words ‘neutral athlete’ which must be in English.

The Russian national anthem cannot be played or sung at any official venue, while flags cannot be displayed either.

A total of 168 Russian athletes competed under a neutral flag at the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang.

Russia has been banned from competing as a nation in athletics since 2015.

An important decision for clean sport – Wada

After the ruling was announced, Wada said it was pleased to have “won this landmark case”, adding it was important for “clean sport across the world”.

“We left no stone unturned in investigating this very complex matter and in presenting our case before Cas,” said Wada president Witold Banka.

“The panel has clearly upheld our findings that the Russian authorities brazenly and illegally manipulated the Moscow laboratory data in an effort to cover up an institutionalised doping scheme.

“In the face of continual resistance and denial from Russia, we clearly proved our case, in accordance with due process. In that regard, this ruling is an important moment for clean sport and athletes all over the world.”

Banka added his agency was “disappointed” the panel did not completely endorse Wada’s initial sanctions, saying he believed a four-year ban was “proportionate and reasonable”.

“Ultimately Wada is not the judge but the prosecutor and we must respect the decision of the panel,” he said.

UK Anti-Doping (Ukad) chief executive Nicole Sapstead said she “welcome” the decision to uphold the ban but was “frustrated” by the reduction to two years.

“This decision demonstrates Wada’s ability to implement a global set of anti-doping rules to which everyone in sport is held,” she added. “The Russia ban is the most severe sanction in sport ever imposed on a nation.

“Wada quite rightly sought to impose the maximum four-year ban. It is hard to imagine a more serious breaking of the rules in sport, so I don’t understand the justification for this reduction.”

A devastating decision – Usada

The US Anti-Doping Agency (Usada) called Cas’ ruling a “weak, watered-down outcome” and a “devastating decision” that represented a “significant loss” to clean athletes.

“To once again escape a meaningful consequence proportional to the crimes, much less a real ban, is a catastrophic blow to clean athletes, the integrity of sport, and the rule of law,” said Usada head Travis Tygart.

He accused Wada and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) of having “manipulated and mishandled this sordid Russian state-doping affair” and having put “politics over principle”.

The IOC said it will “carefully evaluate” the decision and its “consequences” for the Tokyo Games and Beijing Winter Games and it will work with international federations and the International Paralympic Committee to have a “consistent approach”.

Rusada said it was not fully satisfied with the decision, claiming that “not all arguments presented by our lawyers were heard”.

The lawyer for Russian whistleblower and former Moscow laboratory head Grigory Rodchenkov – whose evidence was key to Russia’s suspension – said Cas’s decision was “nonsensical and undeserved”.

“Cas reduced the ban by half, allowing Russian athletes to participate in international sporting events anyway, and in effect upheld an already-limited ban in name only,” said Rodchenkov’s lawyer Jim Walden.

He added that “stronger angels have emerged” to protect clean athletes after the Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act – a bill allowing the US to prosecute anyone involved in doping at international events was signed into law earlier this month.

Grigory Rodchenkov speaks to BBC sports editor Dan Roan in February 2018

How the scandal unfolded

  • December 2014: As many as 99% of Russian athletes are guilty of doping, a German TV documentary alleges.
  • November 2015: A Wada commission publishes an independent report alleging widespread corruption, amounting to state-sponsored doping in Russian track and field athletics. Rusada is declared non-compliant.
  • May 2016: Former Moscow anti-doping laboratory boss Grigory Rodchenkov,external-link who has turned whistleblower, says dozens of Russian athletes at the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi had cheated.
  • July 2016: Russia operated a state-sponsored doping programme for four years across the “vast majority” of summer and winter Olympic sports, says a report from Professor Richard McLaren.
  • August 2016: International Olympic Committee (IOC) decides against imposing a blanket ban on Russian athletes at the 2016 Olympics in Rio.
  • August 2016: But International Paralympic Committee takes different stance and bans Russian competitors from 2016 Paralympics in the Brazilian city.
  • December 2016: Wada publishes the second part of the McLaren report which says more than 1,000 Russian athletes benefited from doping.
  • January 2017: Rusada and Russian sport authorities given list of criteriaexternal-link to achieve before winning back recognition.
  • March 2017: Wada says Russia’s anti-doping reforms are not happening quickly enough.
  • February 2018: Russia are banned from competing at 2018 Winter Olympics in South Korea by the IOC, but 169 athletes who prove they are clean allowed to compete under a neutral flag.
  • May 2018: Wada writes to Rusada offering ‘compromise’ solution.
  • September 2018: News of the compromise, revealed by the BBC, prompts fury from athletes and doping bodies.
  • December 2019: Russia handed a four-year ban from all major sporting events by Wada after Rusada was declared non-compliant for manipulating laboratory data handed over to investigators
  • December 2020: Cas rules Russia’s ban should be reduced to two years

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *